About the Author

James C. Capretta

James C. Capretta

New Atlantis Contributing Editor James C. Capretta is an expert on health care and entitlement policy, with years of experience in both the executive and legislative branches of government. E-mail: jcapretta@aei.org.


 READ MORE

James C. Capretta’s Latest New Atlantis Articles

 Health Care with a Conscience” (Fall 2008) 

 Health Care 2008: A Political Primer” (Spring 2008) 

 The Clipboard of the Future” (Winter 2008)

 

 More on James C. Capretta

Text Patterns - by Alan JacobsFuturisms - Critiquing the project to reengineer humanity

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

On ‘Repeal and Replace’ 

I was asked by the New York Times to participate in another of its online "Room for Debate" exchanges. Here's what I submitted:

The Obama administration and its allies are trying to create the political perception that the mandated coverage provisions that are going into effect this year will take the steam out of the repeal effort. That’s very unlikely to be the case. Yes, some Americans will benefit from these insurance requirements, even as many millions of others pay higher premiums to cover the costs.

But these provisions -- both in terms of the benefits provided, and the costs imposed -- are relatively minor in the scheme of things. Much more significant provisions will be implemented in 2011 and beyond.

And these changes won’t be all good news for American consumers. There are large tax increases in the new law, benefit cuts for Medicare Advantage enrollees, and costly burdens for employers that will raise premiums for millions of people with job-based coverage. Moreover, many employers will be reconsidering offering coverage at all based on the new law’s option for putting workers into new state-based exchanges. This will be disconcerting to millions of workers who are perfectly happy with the insurance they have today.

Republicans have said they are for “repeal and replace,” not just repeal, which means they could roll back the new health law even as they put in place new provisions to ensure secure insurance for those benefiting from the mandates kicking in this year. For instance, Republicans support robust funding for high-risk pools, which would allow many more people with pre-existing conditions to get insurance than will be helped by the modest pools in the new law.

The provisions that are going into effect this year aren’t central to the law’s significant changes to American health care. Repeal is resonating with a large segment of the population because much more sweeping changes are in the works, changes that will redistribute wealth, disrupt insurance arrangements that most people find perfectly acceptable today, and create risks for the quality of American health care. Those concerns are not going away anytime soon.

posted by James C. Capretta | 1:29 pm
Tags: repeal and replace
File As: Health Care